Independent Investigation Services
We provide independent, evidence-based investigations designed to identify root causes, assess risk exposure, and provide defensible findings. Our investigations follow the ICAM (Incident Cause Analysis Method) methodology, using PEEPO (People, Environment, Equipment, Procedures, Organisation) causal analysis to ensure findings are robust, and consistent. We deliver findings you can rely on and act on with confidence.
What We Offer
Incident Review & Investigation
Tier 1 — Standard Investigation
Applies when most or all of the following are true:
Injury or incident did not meet WorkSafe's notifiable event threshold (no serious injury/illness, no notifiable near-miss)
Single site, single shift/incident window
Fewer than 4 witnesses to interview
No suspected regulatory, insurance, or legal action anticipated
Root cause is likely contained to a single process, control, or piece of equipment
Investigation completed within a single site visit (1–2 days on the ground)
Serious Harm / High-Risk Investigation
Tier 2 — Serious Harm / High-Risk Investigation
Applies when any of the following are present:
Incident meets or likely meets WorkSafe's notifiable event criteria under HSWA (serious injury/illness, notifiable illness, or a notifiable near-miss with potential for serious harm)
WorkSafe has been notified, or notification is anticipated
Multiple witnesses (2 or more) or more than one work area/team involved
Root cause investigation likely spans more than one system or control failure (e.g. training gap and equipment fault and supervision breakdown)
Client anticipates needing the findings for ACC, insurance, or internal disciplinary purposes
Multi-day on-site presence required (typically 3–5 days across interviews, evidence gathering, and follow-up)
Complex / Critical Incident Advisory
Tier 3 — Complex / Critical Incident Advisory
Applies when any of the following are present:
Fatality, or an incident with reasonable potential to have caused a fatality
WorkSafe has commenced, or is highly likely to commence, its own formal investigation or enforcement action
Realistic prospect of prosecution against the PCBU and/or an officer personally (s44/s48 exposure)
Multiple sites, multiple witness groups, or an extended timeframe of contributing events
Client's legal counsel is engaged or expected to be engaged, and findings may need to withstand scrutiny in an ERA, coronial, or court process
Ongoing executive/board advisory support is needed beyond the report itself — not just a debrief, but sustained guidance through the incident's aftermath